Comments on: Along the Anza Trail https://friendsofgriffithpark.org/along-the-anza-trail/ Sat, 30 Mar 2024 07:27:22 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3 By: Kathryn Louyse https://friendsofgriffithpark.org/along-the-anza-trail/#comment-12105 Fri, 07 Jan 2022 23:44:55 +0000 http://www.friendsofgriffithpark.org/111/?p=3549#comment-12105 In reply to Phyl van Ammers.

There’s been a variety of debates concerning the actual area where the de Anza party camped. Thanks for tossing a few more into the mix.

And in response to your earlier post, the Los Feliz Rancho (6,647 acres) was far larger than that given to LA City by Griffith J. and Tina (Mary Agnes Christine) Griffith which was 3,015 acres. The Park has grown and now inhabits 4,310 acres. At the time of the bequest, Griffith retained the water rights, a very smart move.

]]>
By: Phyl van Ammers https://friendsofgriffithpark.org/along-the-anza-trail/#comment-12104 Fri, 07 Jan 2022 20:12:19 +0000 http://www.friendsofgriffithpark.org/111/?p=3549#comment-12104 Inasmuch as no one agrees on where the Anza trail was, there probably will not be any signs or even any numbers on an online map. There were 5 places in the LA area with either the name Portezuelo or a garbled version of the name.

The Anza Society has the campground as Universal Studios. Alan K. Brown, author of a book on Anza, has the camp site at the Hollywood Bowl. W.W. Robinson declared it was in Burbank. Vladimir Guerrero wrote it was in Glendale. H.E. Bolton described the camp site as at the edge of Griffith Park near where the 134 passes.

It could not have been any of those places.

]]>
By: Phyl van Ammers https://friendsofgriffithpark.org/along-the-anza-trail/#comment-12103 Fri, 07 Jan 2022 20:07:37 +0000 http://www.friendsofgriffithpark.org/111/?p=3549#comment-12103 The Los Feliz rancho was bigger than Griffith Park. After the 1858 Hansen survey, the rancho was smaller than what Maria Ygnacia Eustacia Verdugo claimed in her petition to Governor Micheltorena. Nonetheless, the shrunken rancho was still much bigger than just today’s Griffith Park.

The Anza expedition did not camp on the river. Father Font, diarist for the expedition, wrote there was adequate water but little — all the horses and mules and people had to drink water. If Anza had camped on the river, there would have been a LOT of water on February 21, 1776, during the rainy season.

]]>
By: carolyn wedt https://friendsofgriffithpark.org/along-the-anza-trail/#comment-10916 Sat, 18 Sep 2021 00:21:37 +0000 http://www.friendsofgriffithpark.org/111/?p=3549#comment-10916 Has Anza trail been marked in such a way that one could follow it from its entry into Griffith park to its exit from park? It seems that there could be online map with numbers on it. Then signs with corresponding numbers would be
posted on route. This would avoid cost of elaborate signs. One quick idea. It would also be good to have city markers like near me where trail comes out of park and goes on

]]>